PDF(4662 KB)
PDF(4662 KB)
PDF(4662 KB)
生物阻抗检测芯片设计综述
Review of bioimpedance detection chip design
综述了生物阻抗检测芯片的设计与优化,重点分析了双电极与四电极的适用场景及其在测量精度和便携性上的取舍。此外,针对不同检测需求,详细探讨了ADC法、DAC法、逐次逼近法、半正弦DAC法及基线消除技术的实现原理与特点。研究结果表明,双电极结合高效DAC方法在便携设备中具有显著优势,而四电极配置则适用于高精度阻抗测量场景。本文为生物阻抗检测芯片的设计提供了理论支持,并展望了其在可穿戴医疗设备和动态监测领域的应用前景。
This paper reviews the design and optimization of bioimpedance detection chips, focusing on the applicable scenarios of dual-electrode and quad-electrode and their trade-offs in measurement accuracy and portability. According to different detection requirements, the implementation principles and characteristics of ADC method, DAC method, successive approximation method, half-sine DAC method and baseline elimination technology are discussed in detail. Studies have shown that dual-electrode combined with efficient DAC method has significant advantages in portable devices, while the four-electrode configuration is suitable for high-precision impedance measurement scenarios. This paper provides theoretical support for the design of bioimpedance detection chips and looks forward to its application prospects in wearable medical devices and dynamic monitoring.
bioimpedance detection / impedance detection principle / ADC / DAC
| [1] |
D K ABDELRAHMAN,
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
This paper explores advanced electrode modeling in the context of separate and parallel transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and electroencephalography (EEG) measurements. We focus on boundary condition-based approaches that do not necessitate adding auxiliary elements, e.g., sponges, to the computational domain. In particular, we investigate the complete electrode model (CEM) which incorporates a detailed description of the skin-electrode interface including its contact surface, impedance, and normal current distribution. The CEM can be applied for both tES and EEG electrodes which are advantageous when a parallel system is used. In comparison to the CEM, we test two important reduced approaches: the gap model (GAP) and the point electrode model (PEM). We aim to find out the differences of these approaches for a realistic numerical setting based on the stimulation of the auditory cortex. The results obtained suggest, among other things, that GAP and GAP/PEM are sufficiently accurate for the practical application of tES and parallel tES/EEG, respectively. Differences between CEM and GAP were observed mainly in the skin compartment, where only CEM explains the heating effects characteristic to tES.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
MUNGE,
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
N V HELLEPUTTE. A 345μW multi-sensor biomedical SoC with bio-impedance 3-channel ECG motion artifact reduction and integrated DSP[J]. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 2015, 50(1):230-244.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
R F YAZICIOGLU,
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
焦御坤. 用于生物阻抗检测的集成电路设计[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2024.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |