FC-CCGA封装可靠性分析与寿命预测

蒋尚, 李文昌, 刘喆, 刘剑, 苏承欣

集成电路与嵌入式系统 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6) : 1-9.

PDF(10237 KB)
PDF(10237 KB)
集成电路与嵌入式系统 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6) : 1-9. DOI: 10.20193/j.ices2097-4191.2025.0145
封面文章

FC-CCGA封装可靠性分析与寿命预测

作者信息 +

Thermal reliability analysis and solder fatigue life prediction of high reliability FC-CCGA packaging

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

随着电子封装技术不断向高密度、高集成度方向发展,FC-CCGA封装因其优越的电热性能和I/O密度,在宇航等高可靠性领域应用日益广泛。而该类封装在服役期间需承受发射阶段的振动载荷和在轨阶段的温度循环载荷,其核心连接部件易因应力累积引发热疲劳失效,直接威胁封装器件的可靠性与使用寿命。基于Anand模型,构建了涵盖芯片凸点、焊柱、环氧胶及PCB板的电装三维模型,系统研究了FC-CCGA封装器件焊柱和凸点的振动可靠性和热疲劳可靠性。研究中开展了电装模型加固前后冲击响应谱分析,通过模拟关键焊柱和凸点在温度循环载荷下的应力-应变响应,分析了焊柱和凸点中的塑性应变分布与演变规律,并基于Coffin-Manson模型预测了焊柱和凸点的热疲劳寿命。对板级封装后的器件进行了温度循环试验,并观察了不同循环次数下焊柱的外观形貌变化,试验结果与仿真预测相符,研究结果为高可靠性应用场景下焊柱结构的优化设计与寿命评估提供了理论依据与方法支撑。

Abstract

As electronic packaging technology advances towards high-density and highly integrated configurations, FC-CCGA packages are increasingly adopted in aerospace and other high-reliability applications due to their superior electrical and thermal performance and I/O density. These packages must withstand vibrational loads during launch and thermal cycling during in-orbit operation, with their core interconnect components susceptible to stress accumulation leading to thermomechanical fatigue failure, directly threatening the reliability and lifespan of the package devices. This study, based on the Anand model, constructs a comprehensive electro-mechanical 3D model encompassing chip bumps, solder columns, epoxy resin, and PCB substrate, systematically investigating the vibration and thermal fatigue reliability of FC-CCGA solder joints and bumps. The analysis includes impact response spectrum assessments pre-electrical and post-electrical reinforcement, simulating the stress-strain response of critical solder joints and bumps under thermal cycling loads, and evaluating the plastic strain distribution and evolution over time. Additionally, the Coffin-Manson model is employed to predict the thermo-mechanical fatigue life of the solder joints and bumps. Temperature cycling tests on packaged devices were conducted, observing morphological changes in solder joints at varying cycle counts. The experimental results align with simulation predictions, providing a theoretical basis and methodological support for optimizing solder joint structures and assessing their lifespan for high-reliability applications.

关键词

FC-CCGA封装 / 温度循环 / 疲劳寿命 / 可靠性分析 / 寿命预测

Key words

FC-CCGA packaging / temperature cycle / fatigue life / reliability analysis / life prediction

引用本文

导出引用
蒋尚, 李文昌, 刘喆, . FC-CCGA封装可靠性分析与寿命预测[J]. 集成电路与嵌入式系统. 2026, 26(6): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.20193/j.ices2097-4191.2025.0145
Jiang Shang, Li Wenchang, Liu Zhe, et al. Thermal reliability analysis and solder fatigue life prediction of high reliability FC-CCGA packaging[J]. Integrated Circuits and Embedded Systems. 2026, 26(6): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.20193/j.ices2097-4191.2025.0145
中图分类号: TP872 (远距离控制和信号、远距离控制和信号系统)   

参考文献

[1]
陈莹磊, 王青春, 曾超. 基于统计的高密度CCGA封装热循环寿命预测方程[J]. 电子工艺技术, 2010, 16(10):196-199.
Chen Y L, Wang Q C, Zeng C. Prediction Equation for Thermal Cycle Life of High-Density CCGA Packaging Based on Statistics[J]. Electronics Process Technology, 2010, 16(10):196-199(in Chinese).
[2]
黄丽娟, 朱正虎, 王民超. 金属封装BGA(CCGA)器件焊接工艺优化研究[J]. 机械工程师, 2019(4):163-165.
Huang L J, Zhu Z H, Wang M C. Research on Welding Process Optimization of Metal Packaged BGA (CCGA) Devices[J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2019(4):163-165(in Chinese).
[3]
李守委, 毛冲冲, 严丹丹. CCGA用焊柱发展现状及面临的挑战[J]. 电子与封装, 2016, 16(4):6-10.
Li S W, Mao C C, Yan D D. Development Status and Challenges of Solder Columns for CCGA[J]. Electronics & Packaging, 2016, 16(4):6-10(in Chinese).
[4]
Ghaffarian R. CCGA Packages for Space Applications[J]. Microelectronics and reliability, 2006, 46(12):2006-2024.
[5]
Suhir E, Ghaffarian R, Nicolics J. Could application of column-grid-array (CGA) technology result in inelastic-strain-free state-of-stress in solder material[J]. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2015, 26(12):10062-10067.DOI:10.1007/s10854-015-3688-6.
[6]
Anand L. Constitutive Equations for the Rate-Dependent Deformation of Metals at Elevated Temperatures[J]. Transactions of the Asme Journal of Engineering Materials & Technology, 1982, 104(1):12.DOI:10.1115/1.3225028.
[7]
Darveaux R. Effect of simulation methodology on solder joint crack growth correlation[C]//Electronic Components and Technology Conference,IEEE, 2000:1048-1058.
[8]
王惠, 官岩, 陈灏. CCGA 封装焊点热疲劳寿命分析[J]. 质量与可靠性, 2020(4):31-38.
Wang H, Guan Y, Chen H. Thermal Fatigue Life Analysis of CCGA Packaging Solder Joints[J]. Quality and Reliability, 2020(4):31-38(in Chinese).
[9]
朱家昌, 潘福跃, 王刚, 等. 超大规模CCGA器件板级互联可靠性研究[J]. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2022, 40(2):10-15.
Zhu J C, Pan F Y, Wang G, et al. Research on Board-Level Interconnection Reliability of Ultra-Large-Scale CCGA Devices[J]. Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing, 2022, 40(2):10-15(in Chinese).
[10]
王海超, 彭小伟. 航天电子产品CCGA加固工艺可靠性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2022, 43(7):102-107,119-120.
摘要
航天电子产品大量应用陶瓷柱栅阵列封装(ceramic column grid array, CCGA)器件,其装焊质量与器件本体尺寸和加固工艺息息相关.文中通过试验和数值仿真方法,研究印制电路板(primted circurt board, PCB)约束、器件加固工艺对大尺寸CCGA焊点可靠性的影响. 仿真与试验结果表明,优化CCGA周围印制电路板约束方式、使用EC-2216环氧胶加固CCGA均可大幅降低随机振动过程中焊点受力. 使用少量环氧胶加固CCGA提高焊点抗振性能的同时,对焊点抗热疲劳性能影响较小,满足QJ 3086A—2016高可靠装焊要求;随着环氧胶点胶量的增多,焊点抗热疲劳性能显著下降,焊点在温差变化较大的服役环境下存在失效风险;在充分优化PCB约束以降低板级振动响应的情况下,使用GD414硅橡胶加固器件也满足航天电子产品高可靠装配要求.
Wang H C, Peng X W. Reliability Analysis of CCGA Reinforcement Process for Aerospace Electronic Products[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2022, 43(7):102-107,119-120(in Chinese).
[11]
冯明祥, 蒋庆磊, 王旭艳. 零应力温度和模型简化对CCGA器件寿命评估的影响[J]. 机械工程学报2024, 60(12):268-276.
Feng M X, Jiang Q L, Wang X Y. Effects of Zero-Stress Temperature and Model Simplification on Life Evaluation of CCGA Devices[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(12):268-276(in Chinese).
[12]
Suhir E, Ghaffarian R, Nicolics J. Predicted stresses in ball-grid-array (BGA) and column-grid-array (CGA) interconnections in a mirror-like package design[J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2016, 27(3):2430-2441.DOI:10.1007/s10854-015-4042-8.
[13]
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Functional Characterization of COTS Boards with CCGA Packages[R]. NASA Technical Report, NDC-SSRI-KB-06-24-2015.
[14]
IPC. IPC-9701A:PerformanceTestMethodsandQualificationRequirementsforSurfaceMountSolderAttachments[S]. Association Connecting Electronics Industries (IPC), 2006.
[15]
Athamneh R A, Hani D B, Ali H, et al. Reliability modeling for aged SAC305 solder joints cycled in accelerated shear fatigue test[J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2020, 104:113507.DOI:10.1016/j.microrel.2019.113507.
[16]
国家军用标准. GJB548C-2021:微电子器件试验方法和程序[S]. 北京: 总装备部, 2021.
National Military Standard ofChina. GJB548C-2021:TestMethodsandProceduresforMicroelectronicDevices[S]. Beijing: General Armaments Department, 2021(in Chinese).
[17]
Engelmaier W. Fatigue Life of Leadless Chip Carrier Solder Joints During Power Cycling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Components Hybrids & Manufacturing Technology, 2003, 6(3):232-237.DOI:10.1109/TCHMT.1983.1136183.
[18]
李晓延, 张富文. 电子封装可靠性工程手册[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2018:168-172.
Li X Y, Zhang F W. Electronic Packaging Reliability Engineering Manual[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2018:168-172(in Chinese).
[19]
皋利利, 李才富, 刘志权, 等. 先进微电子封装焊点可靠性研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(2):185-202.
Gao L L, Li C F, Liu Z Q, et al. Research Progress on Solder Joint Reliability of Advanced Microelectronic Packaging[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58(2):185-202(in Chinese).
[20]
Tech Science Press. Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Thermal Fatigue Lifetime of CBGA Packages[J]. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2022, 130(2):45950.

PDF(10237 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/